Wow, I've been blogging way more than usual lately. Tonight I took a nap, which explains why I'm awake at 1 am with no plans to get to bed anytime soon. I was eating some cereal for dinner and decided to open my picture files and see what I could edit - I'm trying to get more in the habit of doing that, and next month I think I will finally plunk down the money for a Flickr subscription, because it would be awesome to have a place to share/backup my photos, which I don't really have now. Sure, I upload them here, but it's not the same - Vox significantly reduces their size and they are annoying to re-download if I need to (a problem I'm currently having...). But, in order to actually justify paying money for Flickr, I'm going to set myself a goal of editing at least 1 photo a week. Hopefully more, but I'm also trying to add other things to my life at the moment (like Japanese/Korean study) so we'll see how it goes.
I foresee a lot less time spent trolling the internet in my future, and honestly, I'm okay with that. I've become annoyed with myself lately about how frequently I check Ravelry and my email - I end up reading ridiculousness just for something to do, or opening a thread that has only one new post - silly. And I was reading an article today in the NYTimes about the effects of technology on your brain - this one talks about how your brain needs downtime from technology devices, and this one about how our technology-driven lifestyle makes us more impatient and forgetful. Since impatience and forgetfulness are already two of the things that I dislike about myself, and I am trying to work on improving them, I think less time on my computer is probably a good thing (she says as she blogs about this). In addition to that incentive, my hard drive is dying, slowly but surely, and I'd like to prolong it as long as I can - plus I have tons of notebooks I can write in, books to read, knitting to do, watercolors I'd like to do again, and of course the aforementioned studying of languages... plenty to keep me busy that is not electronic. And yet, somehow I always end up feeling like I waste time on the internet and considering how often I think to myself that I don't have enough time... well, something needs to change. I know that there are a few of my flaws I'm not willing to work on yet, but I'm going to try this one and we will see how it goes!
So, on to the real point of this post - photos! Once in a blue moon I decide to edit some photos, but red moons seem slightly more common, and felt more appropriate considering the content of these. In March I took some shots of Pluto class and I pulled one tonight of Stella to work on. I noticed a theme in some of my work - when I'm doing shots of kids, (which is often) I tend to make them pretty high contrast/saturated. To me they 'pop' more, (that's my amateur showing) but they also give more of a feeling of 'little kid', which, let's face it, I'm not lacking in. I think I see the world as more brightly colored than a lot of other people I've met, my eyesight notwithstanding.
Here we go:
Picture Taken 3-8-2010
Started with this shot of Stella, adjusted the brightness a bit.
I really liked the lines in this picture, but I cropped out JaeHyun and Lisa/far end of the table to make it more focused on Stella.
Took me some fiddling to figure out how to get the look I wanted, but I think I got it…
Edited In Office Picture Manager, as all my photos are. (Should really get something better, but it will suffice.
I did this desaturated shot from that as my base.
I thought the amount of red in this shot was interesting, so I started playing around with the amount, saturating it more and more to see how it looked…
After looking at the shot a bit more, I decided to try a tighter cropping. The other lines and shapes were interesting, but mostly distracting.
I tried me other crops too, just to experiment.
As usually happens, I like these crops better than the first one I did - mostly because you can see her hands. I don't know what that's important to me, but I realized it was. The second one is essentially the same as the first, while the third one preserves some of the (probably extraneous) lines that I had originally cropped.
As a side note, even though I didn't intend it I can totally see the use of red /female child in these shots evoking images of Little Red Riding Hood, and probably if you really stretched it, some comment on loli/child sexuality.
I'm interested in your thoughts, people - do you think the background lines are interesting, or do you prefer a more tightly cropped shot? At first I thought the latter, but now I'm leaning towards the 'interesting' side. I guess it depends on the purpose of the picture - as a portrait, the more closely-cropped might be more effective, but from a more artistic point of view, the other lines add something to the photo in terms of giving your eye room and reason to travel.